A Dialogue Game for Dialectical Interaction with Expert Systems

نویسندگان

  • T. J. M. Bench - Capon
  • P. E. S. Dunne
  • P. H. Leng
چکیده

In a variety of applications the most appropriate model of interaction with a knowledge based system is the dialectical discussion, in which a proposition is proposed and argued for. In the course of such a dialogue the tenability of the proposition will be established and the arguments in favour of it adduced and refined. To enable such an interaction it is necessary to formalise the principles underlying such dialogues in a way from which rules to govern system behaviour can be derived. In this paper we argue that the analysis of arguments given by Stephen Toulmin represents a good starting point, and propose a dialogue game based on this schema, adapted to the needs of knowledge based systems. We then sketch an implementation of this game which would provide an interface to a knowledge based system in which queries, their answers and explanations were interleaved in a manner akin to an interpersonal discussion. Such an interface could be used both to interrogate the knowledge base and, if desired, to extend and modify the rules of the knowledge base.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A System for Dispute Mediation: The Mediation Dialogue Game

We propose a dialogue game for mediation and its formalization in DGDL. This dialectical system is available as software through Arvina for automatic execution. This work expands the literature in dialectical systems, in particular those for more than two players, and shows the practical impact on mediation activity through the opportunity offered to mediators once implemented.

متن کامل

A domain specific language for describing diverse systems of dialogue

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t This paper introduces the Dialogue Game Description Language (DGDL), a domain specific language for describing dialectical games. Communication is an important topic within agent research and is a fundamental factor in the development of robust and efficient multiagent systems. Similarly, argumentation has been recognised as a key component of an agent's ab...

متن کامل

A Critical Discussion Game for Prohibiting Fallacies

The study of fallacies is at the heart of argumentation studies. In response to Hamblin’s devastating critique of the state of the theory of fallacies in 1970, both formal dialectical and informal approaches to fallacies developed. In the current paper, we focus on an influential informal approach to fallacies, part of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Central to the pragma-dialec...

متن کامل

A New Dialectical Theory of Explanation

This paper offers a dialogue theory of explanation. A successful explanation is defined as a transfer of understanding in a dialogue system in which a questioner and a respondent take part. The questioner asks a special sort of why-question that asks for understanding of something and the respondent provides a reply that transfers understanding to the questioner. The theory is drawn from recent...

متن کامل

Mechanism Design for Argumentation-Based Information-Seeking and Inquiry

Formal argumentation-based dialogue systems have attracted considerable research interest in the past. Most research in this area introduce “dialectical wrappers” over argumentation formalisms to model verbal interactions amongst agents, resulting in different dialogue models for different types of dialogues, e.g. inquiry or persuasion. In this work, we take a different approach by deploying a ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014